Cigarettes, Alcohol and So-Called Social Fucking Networking

Beer keeps me vaguely sane, and cigarettes give me the nicotine kick I need to stay slightly neurotic. So giving up either of those for New Year is out; in fact, I’m resolving to maintain both habits in a semi-mystic and quasi-religious kind of way. Which leaves me to ponder my list of things to abstain from. I avoid socks for most of the year already, except in the most inclement weather, and to force my toes into the snow for the sake of it seems perverse. It would seem like most of the year I wasn’t trying hard enough and the other part of the year I was trying too hard. I’m seeking balance for 2011.

Denying myself of many other things seems equally arbitrary: I rarely use chocolate except when my blood sugar level plummets to the point that only stuffing my face with a Mars bar can prevent either fury or coma; dodging soap is something I did in my teenage years; and not procrastinating can quite effortlessly be put off until 2013.

Whittling down this list, I slowly realize that the object of my anti-desire has to fulfil several criteria: it has to be something which wastes my time, does not nourish my mind, body or soul, and is something I could forego without too much effort. ‘Social networking’ seems like an obvious candidate, at least in terms of the first two stipulations.

Social networking is, when you think about it, a euphemistic oxymoron. If ‘networking’ is taken to be the money-making, deal-breaking game of poker to advance up the corporate ladder, then I’m somewhat hobbled by the fact that none of my colleagues (and certainly none of my senior colleagues) rank among my Facebook ‘friends’. Network-wise, I am therefore both horizontally and vertically challenged.

This is entirely by choice: nocturnal beer-fuelled rants-slash-status updates might make me feel better, and may even provide (in brief moments of delusional grandeur) a blue-print for changing the world. They might even be mildly amusing for those who have known me long enough to indulge my middle-aged burnings and ravings at the close of day, my raging against the dying of the light, to rather loosely paraphrase Dylan Thomas. Such rantings are, however, likely to lead to an early twilight of one’s career, were one’s betters to read them.

The ‘social’ aspect of ‘social networking’ is even more of a misnomer: there is nothing social about being pinned to my desk absorbing the detritus of the lives of people who I am unlikely – and probably unable – to sit down and have a beer and a chat with in the next twelve months.

Paradoxically, however, for this very reason the third stipulation – foregoing something without too much effort – may be the biggest challenge. While social networking offers me almost zero nutritional content, its potential as a short-acting stimulant is unsurpassed. Like the empty buzz of cheap, burnt coffee, I imbibe Facebook’s slutty dregs anyway. Despite knowing that nothing on Facebook is likely to seriously impact on my life in any meaningful way, I click my mouse in order to see if, this time, I might glean some meager spike in the otherwise flatline of my online life.  Someone, somewhere has maybe acknowledged that I am annoyed about something or other which I would have probably forgotten about had I not posted my minor grievance for all the world to chime in on. But, usually, they haven’t: and I go back to whatever it was I was meant to be doing. At least for five minutes, until the frenetic urge to poke my virtual fucking nose into somefuck else’s business grips me once more, and I feel strangely satiated by the sheer fact that, like me, nothing at all of any significance has happened in their life in the last 300 seconds.

So, adieu Facebook. You’ve served me well over the last three years, or at least since such time as I no longer remember that you did not exist. I don’t dwell on what I did with my life without you, and I shan’t post-mortemise our relationship in much detail in the future. For the seven people reading this: we didn’t need Facebook to stay in touch. For the 431 people who aren’t: well, all I have to say is …

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Politics and Economics

2 responses to “Cigarettes, Alcohol and So-Called Social Fucking Networking

  1. Roger

    Interesting and thought provoking…

  2. Hans Ebert

    I remember your eyes when shortly after stopping wanting to be a journalist, you met Nigel, a girl cried, I thought fuck Fanon – I asked him who said
    “Surely, no government can be expected to foster its own subversion, but in a democracy such a right is vested in the people (i.e. in the majority of the people). This means that the ways should not be blocked on which a subversive majority could develop, and if they are blocked by organized repression and indoctrination, their reopening may require apparently undemocratic means. They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc” he didn’t know AND he’d never read any Shakespeare.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s